STFC / SmarterGPT
Engineering / Retrospective

Keep the work we changed our minds about.

An honest project record needs removed mechanisms and superseded designs, not just the parts that survived.

25 OCT 20263 MIN READEDITORIAL DRAFT
Editorial draft · This private review edition is a working publication. Project readiness is described separately on each project page.

A project directory can make development look inevitable: a problem, a repository, a finished thing. Actual work has branches, reversals, and ideas that stop earning their place.

A concrete example: Profiles

The current Profiles README explicitly records deletion of the installation-marker selector, path-bound enrollment receipts, and compatibility wrapper. The host now supplies the requested identity and store mode explicitly; the removed fallback is not retained.

That is enough to describe the changed contract. It is not enough, by itself, to reconstruct every reason the earlier design was chosen or every step that led to its removal. A deeper retrospective needs the relevant decisions and commits.

Use the right status

Removed means removed. Superseded means a later approach took its place. Paused means we may return. Abandoned means we decided to stop. Unfinished does not tell us which of those happened.

Keep conclusions proportional to evidence

The public Companion repository also preserves a different desktop application approach. Its existence alone does not establish that all of it was abandoned or that every capability moved to Bridge. That lineage deserves a dedicated history review.

This site will keep a record of changed directions as the evidence becomes available. We will not fill the gaps with a cleaner story than the history supports.

Sources & further readingProfiles README / explicit removal record Companion / historical implementation Project history ledger Source review: 25 October 2026. Linked guidance may change.